1986 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2010 Renault Laguna is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Laguna (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1986 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Falcon.
Because 1986 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Laguna (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Falcon. (241 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Laguna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Falcon | 2010 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | Laguna |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2750 mm |