1986 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Scion xB
To start off, 2010 Scion xB is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion xB (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1986 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Falcon.
Because 1986 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Scion xB, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Falcon (241 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Scion xB. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Falcon | 2010 Scion xB | |
Make | Ford | Scion |
Model | Falcon | xB |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 241 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4249 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2601 mm |