1986 Ford Fiesta vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1986 Ford Fiesta is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1986 Ford Fiesta. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Fiesta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1986 Ford Fiesta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Fiesta. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Fiesta.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Fiesta | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Fiesta | 2000 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1392 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2700 mm |