1986 Ford Fiesta vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Fiesta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Fiesta has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Fiesta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Fiesta | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Fiesta | XC90 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 957 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2650 mm |