1986 Ford Granada vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1986 Ford Granada is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Granada (151 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Granada should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Granada weights approximately 240 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Granada (219 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Granada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Granada | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Granada | 2000 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 219 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |