1986 Ford Granada vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,394 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1986 Ford Granada. (128 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 80 kg more than 1986 Ford Granada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Granada (204 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (183 Nm). This means 1986 Ford Granada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Granada | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Granada | Tribute |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2394 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1306 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 62 L |