1986 Ford Laser vs. 1981 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1986 Ford Laser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Laser (66 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Laser should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 82 kg more than 1986 Ford Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Laser (94 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Laser | 1981 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Laser | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1986 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 94 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 882 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2460 mm |