1986 Ford Meteor vs. 1965 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1986 Ford Meteor is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Meteor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Meteor (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Meteor should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Meteor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Meteor (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Meteor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Meteor | 1965 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Meteor | R 360 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1770 mm |