1986 Ford Meteor vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Meteor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Meteor would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Meteor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Meteor (71 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Meteor should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Meteor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Meteor (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Meteor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Meteor | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Meteor | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1810 mm |