1986 Ford Meteor vs. 2010 Mazda 6

To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Meteor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Meteor would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (272 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1986 Ford Meteor. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Meteor.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (364 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Meteor. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Meteor. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Meteor has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Meteor will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Ford Meteor 2010 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Meteor 6
Year Released 1986 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 71 HP 272 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 121 Nm 364 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4200 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1839 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2789 mm