1986 Ford Mustang vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A

To start off, 1986 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Mustang (88 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Mustang weights approximately 75 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Ford Mustang 1949 Jeep CJ2A
Make Ford Jeep
Model Mustang CJ2A
Year Released 1986 1949
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2294 cc 2199 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 88 HP 59 HP
Torque 161 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1185 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 3130 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1460 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2040 mm