1986 Ford Mustang vs. 1955 Wartburg 312
To start off, 1986 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Mustang (88 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1955 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1955 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Mustang weights approximately 225 kg more than 1955 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Mustang | 1955 Wartburg 312 | |
| Make | Ford | Wartburg |
| Model | Mustang | 312 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2294 cc | 900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 36 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 6.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2460 mm |
