1986 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Seat 1500
To start off, 1986 Ford Mustang is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Mustang (88 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1966 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Mustang weights approximately 25 kg more than 1966 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Mustang | 1966 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Mustang | 1500 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |