1986 Ford Mustang vs. 1974 Mazda 616
To start off, 1986 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Mustang (88 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Mustang weights approximately 273 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Mustang | 1974 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | 616 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1974 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2294 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2480 mm |
