1986 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 1986 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Omega would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Mustang weights approximately 36 kg more than 1977 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 1986 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Mustang | 1977 Oldsmobile Omega | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Mustang | Omega |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2294 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1149 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2670 mm |
