1986 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Mustang (88 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Mustang weights approximately 345 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Mustang | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Mustang | R2 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2294 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 161 Nm | 58 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 56 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 66.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2370 mm |
