1986 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 200 kg more than 1986 Ford Mustang.
Because 1986 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Mustang. (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Mustang | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Mustang | Countryman |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2595 mm |