1986 Ford Orion vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1986 Ford Orion is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Orion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Orion weights approximately 10 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Orion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Orion has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Orion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Orion | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Orion | Celeste |
Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2350 mm |