1986 Ford Orion vs. 1982 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1986 Ford Orion is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Orion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 80 kg more than 1986 Ford Orion.
Because 1982 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Orion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Orion | 1982 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Orion | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2530 mm |