1986 Ford Orion vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Orion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Orion would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1986 Ford Orion. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Orion.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Orion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Orion. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Orion.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Orion | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | Orion | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1751 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |