1986 Ford Orion vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Orion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Orion would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1986 Ford Orion. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Orion.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Orion. (110 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Orion.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Orion | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Orion | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1751 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 151 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 65 L |