1986 Ford Orion vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Orion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Orion would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi TT weights approximately 620 kg more than 1986 Ford Orion.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Orion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Orion has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Orion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Orion | 2012 Audi TT | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Orion | TT |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4199 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1349 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 60 L |
