1986 Ford Orion vs. 2012 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2012 Nissan GT-R is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Orion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Orion would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan GT-R weights approximately 817 kg more than 1986 Ford Orion.
Because 2012 Nissan GT-R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Orion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Nissan GT-R has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Orion has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Orion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Nissan GT-R will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Orion | 2012 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Orion | GT-R |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 530 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1737 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4671 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1369 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2779 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 74 L |