1986 Ford Orion vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Orion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Orion would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1986 Ford Orion. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Orion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 937 kg more than 1986 Ford Orion. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Orion. (101 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Orion. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Orion has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Orion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Ford Orion 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make Ford Cadillac
Model Orion XTS
Year Released 1986 2013
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1297 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 62 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 101 Nm 358 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 64.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.5
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 880 kg 1817 kg
Vehicle Length 4220 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2831 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 72 L