1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1951 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1951 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Ranger | XK |
Year Released | 1986 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |