1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Marcos 1600
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Marcos 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Marcos 1600 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Marcos 1600 (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Marcos 1600 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Marcos 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1967 Marcos 1600 | |
Make | Ford | Marcos |
Model | Ranger | 1600 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1652 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1590 mm |