1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (116 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Ranger | Elan |
Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |