1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Celeste |
Year Released | 1986 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |