1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1976 Volvo 265
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1976 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 265 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |