1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1978 Zastava 132
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 132.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Ranger | 1978 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Ranger | 132 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
