1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1979 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1979 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1979 Zastava 1300.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1979 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Ranger | 1300 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |