1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Volvo 260
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 260 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Volvo 260. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1982 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 260 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |