1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lincoln Continental (114 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Ranger | Continental |
Year Released | 1986 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |