1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner (120 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 1995 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Space Runner |
Year Released | 1986 | 1995 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |