1986 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 1996 Proton 300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Ranger | 1996 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Ford | Proton |
| Model | Ranger | 300 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
