1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Honda Capa
To start off, 2000 Honda Capa is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2000 Honda Capa. (97 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Capa.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda Capa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Honda Capa has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda Capa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 2000 Honda Capa | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ranger | Capa |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |