1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Volvo S40
To start off, 2000 Volvo S40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Volvo S40. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo S40.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo S40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 2000 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | S40 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 108 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |