1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Opel Omega
To start off, 2003 Opel Omega is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Opel Omega (142 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Ranger | 2003 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Ford | Opel |
| Model | Ranger | Omega |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
