1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2005 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Grand Am should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Pontiac Grand Am. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 2005 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | Ranger | Grand Am |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |