1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Proton Satria
To start off, 2006 Proton Satria is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Proton Satria. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Proton Satria.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Proton Satria. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 2006 Proton Satria | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Ranger | Satria |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |