1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2008 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2008 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Lincoln Mark LT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Lincoln Mark LT has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Lincoln Mark LT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Ranger | 2008 Lincoln Mark LT | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Ranger | Mark LT |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
