1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot RCZ (197 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | RCZ |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1845 mm |