1986 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Nissan Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Ranger | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Z |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 327 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4246 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1845 mm |