1986 Ford Sierra vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 1986 Ford Sierra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Sierra (89 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Sierra should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Sierra weights approximately 209 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Ford Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Sierra | 1950 Saab 92 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Sierra | 92 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1769 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1014 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |