1986 Ford Sierra vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Sierra (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Sierra should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Because 1986 Ford Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Sierra (216 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Sierra | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Sierra | Ka |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 40 L |