1986 Ford Sierra vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1986 Ford Sierra. (160 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Sierra.
Because 1986 Ford Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Sierra. (216 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Sierra | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Sierra | UTE |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
