1986 Ford Sierra vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Sierra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1274 kg more than 1986 Ford Sierra.
Because 1986 Ford Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Ford Sierra | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Ford | Fisker |
| Model | Sierra | Karma |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1984 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 116 L | 36 L |
