1986 Ford Taurus vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1986 Ford Taurus is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Taurus weights approximately 825 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Taurus (187 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Taurus | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | Taurus | 600 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 767 cc |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |