1986 Ford Taurus vs. 1979 Volvo 265
To start off, 1986 Ford Taurus is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,662 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1986 Ford Taurus. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Taurus.
Because 1979 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 265 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Taurus. (187 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Taurus | 1979 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Taurus | 265 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 2662 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |