1986 Ford Taurus vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 1999 Renault Scenic is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Scenic (105 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1986 Ford Taurus. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Taurus weights approximately 49 kg more than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Taurus (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Scenic. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Ford Taurus | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taurus | Scenic |
Year Released | 1986 | 1999 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |